gitwtfhub

wtf is build-or-skip?

szewailawlis/build-or-skip — explained in plain English

Analysis updated 2026-05-18

1PythonAudience · pm founderComplexity · 3/5LicenseSetup · moderate

TL;DR

Build or Skip is a Dify AI workflow that scores a product idea and applies fixed code rules to decide BUILD, IMPROVE, or SKIP, and is willing to say no.

Mindmap

mindmap
  root((build-or-skip))
    What it does
      Evaluates product ideas
      Gives BUILD IMPROVE SKIP
      Code decides not AI
    Tech stack
      Python
      Dify
      gpt-4o-mini
    Use cases
      Score idea feasibility
      Generate verdict reports
      Customize rubric
    Audience
      Founders
      Product managers

Code map

Detail Auto

An interactive map of this repo's files and how they connect — its source is parsed live in your browser. Click Visualize to build it.

filefunction / class

Why would anyone build with this?

REASON 1

Get an honest BUILD, IMPROVE, or SKIP verdict on a product idea before investing time in it.

REASON 2

See a structured breakdown of a product idea's target user, core problem, and feasibility.

REASON 3

Import the Dify workflow and adjust the scoring rubric or verdict thresholds for your own criteria.

REASON 4

Read example evaluations to understand why an idea like a quote app scored high but still got skipped.

What's in the stack?

PythonDifygpt-4o-mini

How it stacks up

szewailawlis/build-or-skip0xustaz/streamgatea-bissell/unleash-lite
Stars111
LanguagePythonPythonPython
Setup difficultymoderatehardhard
Complexity3/54/54/5
Audiencepm founderdeveloperresearcher

Figures from each repo's GitHub metadata at analysis time.

How do you spin it up?

Difficulty · moderate Time to first run · 30min

Requires a Dify account and your own OpenAI API key to run your own copy, or you can use the hosted live demo instead.

Wtf does this do

Build or Skip is an AI workflow that evaluates a product idea and tells you honestly whether it is worth building. Most idea evaluation tools tend to encourage whatever you type in, but this one is designed to be willing to say no, and even to tell you to stop when an idea is not strong enough. The project is built on Dify, a platform for chaining AI steps together, rather than being a single prompt. The author explains that an earlier single prompt version was unreliable in specific ways: it almost always said BUILD even for ideas too large for one person, it sometimes changed its verdict without actually narrowing the scope of the idea, and mixing extraction, scoring, decision making, and report writing into one prompt made it hard to tell which part had failed. The current version splits the process into separate steps that each do one job. The workflow first extracts structured details from a rough idea, such as the target user, the core problem, and the main features. Next, an AI model scores the idea on three dimensions from one to five: how clear the target user is, how strong the underlying problem is, and how feasible a first version would be. A key design choice is that the actual verdict of BUILD, IMPROVE, or SKIP is decided by plain code with fixed rules, not by the AI model itself, so the same three scores always produce the same verdict. Depending on which verdict is reached, a different set of instructions generates the final report, and a SKIP verdict deliberately produces no build plan at all, only a short note that the problem is already solved well enough by existing options. The README walks through an example where the workflow initially approved a daily motivational quote app because it scored well on every measure, until the scoring rubric was adjusted to ask what a user does today without the product. That single change flipped the verdict to SKIP. To try it, you can use the hosted live demo, or import the included workflow file into Dify yourself and add your own OpenAI API key. It runs on the gpt-4o-mini model and a full evaluation costs roughly two tenths of a cent. The project is released under the MIT license.

Yoink these prompts

Prompt 1
Walk me through how this Dify workflow scores a product idea and decides BUILD, IMPROVE, or SKIP.
Prompt 2
Explain why this project moves the final verdict decision into fixed code instead of letting the AI model decide.
Prompt 3
How do I import workflow.yml into Dify and run my own product idea through this evaluator?
Prompt 4
Show me the scoring rubric change described in this README that turned a BUILD verdict into SKIP.

Frequently asked questions

wtf is build-or-skip?

Build or Skip is a Dify AI workflow that scores a product idea and applies fixed code rules to decide BUILD, IMPROVE, or SKIP, and is willing to say no.

What language is build-or-skip written in?

Mainly Python. The stack also includes Python, Dify, gpt-4o-mini.

How hard is build-or-skip to set up?

Setup difficulty is rated moderate, with roughly 30min to a first successful run.

Who is build-or-skip for?

Mainly pm founder.

View the repo → Decode another repo

This repo across BitVibe Labs

Don't trust strangers blindly. Verify against the repo.